Talk:Julian Assange

From A Closer Look On Syria
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Julian Assange faces extradition from the UK to the United States after he was arrested and forcibly removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London almost seven years after he sought refuge there. The WikiLeaks founder was brought before Westminster Magistrates' Court this afternoon where he was found guilty of breaching bail conditions in 2012. He was remanded in custody and will be sentenced at Southwark Crown Court at a later date. Assange faces up to 12 months in prison on the charge. He will next appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on 2 May by video-link in relation to the extradition case.

Known Indictments and investigations

Alleged investigations/charges

2012
  • US said to designate Assange 'enemy' of the state. Military who 'communicate' with WikiLeaks could face death penalty. - Rik Myslewski, The Register, September 28, 2012
  • US calls Assange 'enemy of state' - Philip Dorling, The Sydney Morning Herald, September 27, 2012
    The documents, some originally classified "Secret/NoForn" - not releasable to non-US nationals - record a probe by the air force's Office of Special Investigations into a cyber systems analyst based in Britain who allegedly expressed support for WikiLeaks and attended pro-Assange demonstrations in London. The suspected offence was "communicating with the enemy, 104-D", an article in the US Uniform Code of Military Justice that prohibits military personnel from "communicating, corresponding or holding intercourse with the enemy". The analyst's access to classified information was suspended. However, the investigators closed the case without laying charges. The analyst denied leaking information.
  • 904. ARTICLE 104. AIDING THE ENEMY , US Uniform Code of Military Justice
    --Resup (talk) 07:32, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

“Vault 7“ leak, 2017

USC

Statute of limitations

Statute of limitations for most federal crimes is 5 years; as 'anything', with exceptions. A theory is floated that "terrorism" exception is applied (National Review, Apr. 11, 2019). That may or may not be not necessary depending of the meaning of the "fugitive" article , 18 U.S. § 3290 --Resup (talk) 20:09, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

UK - US Extradition Treaty

Part 2 of the Act: Extradition to category 2 territories (non-European Arrest Warrant territories) removed the requirement on the USA to provide prima facie evidence in extraditions from the UK, requiring instead only reasonable suspicion.

External opinions

Professionals
Journalists
Politicians
  • Are US/UK Trying To Kill Assange? -Ron Paul Liberty Report, May 30. 2019
    RP: ...we do not have moral system of justice, we do not have constitutional system of justice, and it is just totally out of control....
    --Resup (talk) 19:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Interviews

Court statements

Discussion

Julian Assange has been taken to HMP Belmarsh which is a Category A Prison. Category A: “Those whose escape would be highly dangerous to the public or national security. Offences that may result in consideration for Category A or Restricted Status include: , Attempted murder, Manslaughter, Wounding with intent, Rape, Indecent assault, Robbery or conspiracy to rob (with firearms), Firearms offences, Importing or supplying Class A controlled drug, Possessing or supplying explosives, Offences connected with terrorism and Offences under the Official Secrets Act”. Category A prisoners are further segregated into Standard Risk, High Risk, and Exceptional Risk, based on their likelihood of escaping. www.justice.gov.uk/...40-2011-categorisation-adult-males.doc Seems the categorisation decision has little to do with the actual charges brought in the UK against Assange, but on assement on wider 'risk' factors: (i) escape/abscond or (ii) risk of harm to the public in the event of an escape or abscond (iii) the safety of others within the prison (iv) the good order of the prison

-- Diagonal

My guess, (reality =) offensives equivalent to those under the Official Secrets Act, committed in USA; + (nominally) 'escape risk' + (past-and-maybe-future allegedly) 'rape' --Resup (talk) 12:35, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

My guess, its more to do with managing the consequence of having such high profile anti establishment figure in a prison. Lockdowned in Belmarsh its easier to control other prisoners reactions, his interactions with other prisoners, harder for tidbits of info to get out on the grapevine etc, than it would be at a regular facility. Looks to me hard to justify on grounds of skipping bail (just my unqualified guess). But it is just where national security part of prison system is and where they can get at him. --Diagonal (talk) 14:34, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Also, trying their best to prevent vindictive publications ... --Resup (talk) 15:44, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Letters,

@GordonDimmack I received a letter from Julian Assange + RT, May 24/25, 2019 --Resup (talk) 23:53, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Reports from prisoners