Talk:Charlie Hebdo attack
- Charlie Hebdo: False flag operation Paul Craig Roberts, Pravda
- Usually Muslim terrorists are prepared to die in the attack; yet the two professionals who hit Charlie Hebdo were determined to escape and succeeded, an amazing feat. Their identity was allegedly established by the claim that they conveniently left for the authorities their ID in the getaway car. Such a mistake is inconsistent with the professionalism of the attack and reminds me of the undamaged passport found miraculously among the ruins of the two WTC towers that served to establish the identity of the alleged 9/11 hijackers.
- It is a plausible inference that the ID left behind in the getaway car was the ID of the two Kouachi brothers, convenient patsies, later killed by police, and from whom we will never hear anything, and not the ID of the professionals who attacked Charlie Hebdo. An important fact that supports this inference is the report that the third suspect in the attack, Hamyd Mourad, the alleged driver of the getaway car, when seeing his name circulating on social media as a suspect realized the danger he was in and quickly turned himself into the police for protection against being murdered by security forces as a terrorist.
- Hamyd Mourad says he has an iron-clad alibi. If so, this makes him the despoiler of a false flag attack. Authorities will have to say that despite being wrong about Mourad, they were right about the Kouachi brothers. Alternatively, Mourad could be coerced or tortured into some sort of confession that supports the official story.
- According to Charlie Hebdo Journalist, one of the attackers had BLUE EYES (video) --Caustic Logic (talk) 14:37, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Getaway footage: I saw this, with an Australian overdubbing incredulous notes, making some good points. Cannot relocate the video now. Is it still around? Anyone know what I'm talking about?--Caustic Logic (talk) 14:37, 17 January 2015 (UTC)