Category talk:Information war

https://timhayward.wordpress.com/2018/12/15/integrity-grasping-the-initiative/ updated list of references from Tim Hayward

It's up to others, but I do not see that we can cover II ourselves. It has a lot of personal information, and I do not want to go there. In my view that distracts. potentially prevents, from possibility to discuss issues, not persons. To discuss persons would be unfair in anonymous mode, IMO. But in my circumstances this is not something I would want to do. It's different with Tim Hayward and others in their group, they publish under real names, and this is something directly related to their professional activity, and they were personally attacked in media for their views so it is fair for them to attack back --Resup (talk) 23:32, 10 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Sorry for any misunderstanding. I see where you coming from. I was really just suggesting if the current links we have on II should be moved to their own topic page and be linked to other pages in this category as it seems they are relevent to the narratives of Russian aggression/malign activity in general. --Diagonal (talk) 10:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, not sure, why not, maybe admin privileged people can advice --Resup (talk) 11:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

CNN allegations against Prigozin company in Sudan
Have just seen this from CNN in tandem with Khodookovsky's Dossier center CNN has assessed the documents to be credible. AP on Dossier centre ''The Dossier Center says it rejects the indiscriminate information dumps that made WikiLeaks notorious. Its five full-time employees cross-reference incoming data to verify it and sift through files with an eye toward what might help build a legal case or feed a news story.'' --Diagonal (talk) 09:12, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Prior stories from Dossier Center: German far-right MP 'could be absolutely controlled by Russia' BBC Gabriel Gatehouse April 5, 2019