File talk:Lars Bromley profile.jpg

What a dim tool. His claim to fame is Russia blame by saying big crater = air bomb. Applied to a scene where we see no large craters. He says satellite images show them. Maybe. One crater seen, inside, is small, low-power, and left all but a torn few boxes alone just inches away. Definite sign of Russian bombing; too sophisticated for Syria - it leaves small discrete craters and boxes unharmed, so they can deny it later. Artillery or rebel rockets would have obliterated the warehouse.

I mean, remember the Aleppo University Attack? Activists said it was a jet strike with its puny air-to-surface missiles. The government said it was two powerful surface rockets fired by rebels in Lairamoun. Western experts decided there were no jet sounds, the blasts and craters seemed too powerful for anything a jet would fire, and a regime Scud missile was fingered.

So anyway, the craters at the attack site are too small to be from false-flag rebel rockets or SCUDS, or the claimed "barrel bombs," so it must be Russian jets, as a simple satellite view reveals. Or... confused now. Something like that. --Caustic Logic (talk) 11:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Has anyone been able to pinpoint a crater in any of the ground level footage? -- Petri Krohn (talk) 11:38, 6 October 2016 (UTC)