File:FBI memo Seth Rich.jpg


 * Source
 * File: Full redacted Seth Rich memo - with code SCRDC-408 (i.redd.it); (archive.fo), submitted by HortleWort to the_Donald
 * Joe Biggs on Twitter: "Just got a heavily redacted FBI memo mentioning Seth Rich laptop and says emails detail DNC and Wikileaks. Will be releasing soon."
 * BAM EXCLUSIVE FBI Memo Reveals Seth Rich Had DNC Documents On Laptop - Joe Biggs, May 28, 2017

Appears to use different font sizes in the body of the memo. At the bottom, 'classified' and the reference number are of different font size and not aligned vertically.
 * Notes

Fabrication?

 * @wikileaks on Twitter - 28 May 2017
 * ''This doc is an exceedingly [deliberately?] poor quality fabrication as is indicated by the header and other elements https://twitter.com/Rambobiggs/status/868726722606374912
 * @Rambobiggs on Twitter - 28 May 2017
 * Video: Joe Biggs‏ says the FBI source is the same used by Malia Zimmerman of Fox News.
 * The source comes out on Twitter as TruthWyspr‏.
 * @BrickeSkwad  - 28 May 2017
 * You have no credibility and every sensitive piece of info is usually secret or confidential. "Classified" is the stuff of courtrooms/fiction (+replies)
 * This is a real document which has 'classified' on it, though it is placed and formatted differently

Only unclassified documents say unclassified. Classified documents state the secrecy class they are classified into, for example TOP SECRET/NOFORN or SECRET//ORCON/NOFORN. See Classified information in the United States. Documents may also have: classified by (+ number), and declassify on (date), as in the vault link above.

FOIA?
Well, the apparent point of this is for somebody to submit a freedom of information act request using this reference number, which (the number), in principle, can be real, even if the document, as presented, is not. With all the publicity, hopefully there will be at least one person submitting FOIA request ( yet not too many to over-annoy and overwhelm the system ...) Interesting to see what a FOIA request will bring--if this is fake, obviously there will be zero result, like no doc with such reference number exists. --Resup (talk) 22:32, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Web info; online form ; frequently requested records