Talk:Assault on Kobane

No talk page at all? That doesn't seem right. Now that Newsweek has written about it I suppose Kobane is the logical place for US air strikes, if they happen. --Caustic Logic (talk) 22:40, 20 September 2014 (UTC)


 * No, it's Ankara. ;o) --CE (talk) 09:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Kobaine, aka Ain Al Arab, is in Syria, near the border of Turkey. It is inhabited by Kurds, Arabs, Turkmen, and Armenians, and since July 2012 is controlled by the Kurds. As such it is a part of story, potentially involving host countries Syria, Iraq, Turkey, and Iran. E.g. Kurdish Peshmerga forces recently clashed with Iranian forces near a Kurdish Iranian city Sardasht, located on the border of Iran and the Iraqi Kurdistan Region. We may want to have some pages for Kurdistan as a whole (and this starts to get complicated, with several intersecting players involved, and no own state for the Kurds in existence. )

It appears that Turkey  recently  warmed up towards a Kurdish state in Northern Iraq, but still fearful of greater Kurdish autonomy spilling over to its own lands  --Resup (talk) 11:57, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * If you haven't read it already, take a look at my attempt at describing the micro situation in a very similar chain of events almost two years ago. In the broader picture, the main reason why the Iraqi Kurds get help and the Syrian and Turkish Kurds have problems doing so is ... the latter's leading political forces are "commies" in the eyes of the "West". --CE (talk) 13:17, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Coming back to this, stuff I've read since then (mostly thanks to you) - and my own semi-informed thoughts - suggests Kurds on both sides the Syria border are to be screwed and displaced, traumatized and pushed east, where the West wants to help make the fragmentation of Iraq permanent as the pipeline to Europe and maybe start on boosting Iranian Kurdistan. And of course the weapon Turkey is using on that project is the poison spewiing from the Gulf and other Wahabbi zones, the disposable Islamo-nihilist meat puppets populating Daesh and the like... What do you think of that reading? --Caustic Logic (talk) 12:09, 4 December 2014 (UTC)


 * It is really difficult to say what will happen next. The recent end of Southstream and formation of a Russia-Turkey strategic alliance is a true game changer. On the surface, Turkey is a huge winner in this. There will be a price that is not visible that Putin demanded. I like to think that this is giving up the idea to get rid of Assad and now becoming serious about trying to get peace to Syria, which includes stopping to support ISIS. And that is very much in Turkey's interest at this point, because it is close to the point where the Turkish Kurds seriously put up arms again, and that's something nobody (except the Empire) can want. Hopefully Putin managed to help Erdogan realize how much he was played. But I wouldn't bet on it. Maybe the Sultan thinks he can play the Czar... --CE (talk) 13:53, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Report: Up to 700 "trapped"

Staffan de Mistura, the UN special envoy for Syria  said 500-700 elderly people and other civilians were still trapped in the town, while 10,000 to 13,000 others were stuck close to the border. --Resup (talk) 18:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

23.10 NY Times Editorial: Why Kobani Must Be Saved --Resup (talk) 03:55, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

NATO airstrikes
NATO has finally bombed "ISIS" in the Kobane suburbs. (video) Military Maps puts the spot on the main road to the south. NATO logic: $1 billion bomber drops a $100,000 bomb on a $5 tent a $10 million M1A1 tank they paid for. Best of all: the B1 bomber makes a 10,000 miler return trip to hit a spot that is 1 mile from the NATO border. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 13:13, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Pentagon: it may not end just there--Resup (talk) 13:50, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/24/opinion/why-kobani-must-be-saved.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region&region=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region

International Organisations
Under-Secretary-General Valerie Amos - Statement on Kobane/Ayn al-Arab "If we don't act now, this will be another tragedy for the Syrian people and a stain on the conscience of humanity."

.--Resup (talk) 05:38, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

ISIS Operations in and from Turkey
Late September: video footage and a photo from a Turkish news crew supposedly show a small group of ISIS guys at an un-guarded crossing to Syria (a small underpass of the border railroad), which A Bellingcat investigation geo-locates an apparent match on October 1, several km west of Kobane. There were men a ways in on a Syrian hilltop, maybe just signaling. That investigator thought the clothing and location suggested, but didn't prove, they were ISIS/Daesh fighters moving freely at a hole in the Turkish border. It was noted this doesn't prove Turkish government complicity. --Caustic Logic (talk) 12:21, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Nov. 29 Suicide Bombings: Kurds blame Turkey as Isis suicide bombers attack Kobani, Reuters via Irish Times - The Atlantic (the Wire) reported it - Yahoo News re-post of that got hundreds of comments, mostly urging Turkey's expulsion from NATO, some with further measures proposed. --Caustic Logic (talk) 12:21, 30 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Same in SPIEGEL which reports this as fact, article written yesterday before Ankara denied the Undeniable (see more evidence I just added). Takes only a couple of comments until someone demands to kick Turkey out of NATO. First step would be to remove the German PATRIOTs, though, which were moved there after ... what was it, the Reyhanli bombings? In any case something that turned out to have been done without the involvement of yesteryear's new Hitler Assad. We'll see. I doubt there will be consequences for Erdogan and his smirking little sidekick, but they are really stretching it now. --CE (talk) 13:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Oh, btw, there has been a surprisingly direct (English language) report by Deutsche Welle about ISIS supply lines from Turkey. Tony Cartalucci has some crucial comments on the context of the short film (which is embedded over there).

Minefield Refugee Camps
On December 2, Human Rights Watch released a report about Kobane (here spelled Kobani) refugees who had been forced to camp in Turkish-run minefields. Much of this information has surely been reported previously, and the bulk of the flight seems to date back to September. As of reporting, they report around 2,000 people remained camped in five different areas of what HRW's graphics show as an unavoidable band of minefields across the entire border area here except the actual crossing zone, with the way in open (if across the raliroad tracks) and the far side fenced off. A newly-built parking lot for refugee cars sits nearby, half-empty. They're not allowed to bring their cars or livestock, and the refugees largely refuse to leave them behind. So they stay. Or so this reads. --Caustic Logic (talk) 12:42, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Syria/Turkey: Landmines Kill Civilians Fleeing Kobani

At least nine serious injuries and three deaths directly from triggered landmines had been reported tp HRW as of reporting. If that's even close to true, it sounds almost livable. Livestock were also killed/injured and vehicles damaged. On November 8, witnesses report, ISIS forces (in Syria?) fired mortars on "the largest civilian concentration in the Tel Shair corridor " (the eastern encampment), killing three people, including a child, with at least one more mortar barrage after evidenced in satellite images prior to Nov. 13. --Caustic Logic (talk) 12:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Of course, this is Turkey's minefield, laid decades ago officially to prevent smuggling. ISIS is able to get across it okay on a regular basis, apparently, as their recent direct attack through the Kobane crossing is taken as big news, apparently through the unavoidable fields is how they usually get there, if it's anywhere in this zone. It must not be too fierce - 2,000 people live there with perhaps only 3 killed by mines so far? (note: one set of victim, two young men, were somehow "decapitated" by the ... land .. mines. Sounds unusual. --Caustic Logic (talk) 12:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

HRW called for the refugees to be relocated and also educated by Turkish authorities, who should then remove all their mines immediately. For background they note Turkey's signing of the "mine ban treaty," in line with which Ankara had started by 2009 a process to eventually clear all its supposedly outdated minefields. This process was paused in July, 2013 "because of developments in Syria," as HRW put it. Progress was frozen at what we see now (zero progress?) Also, the other states of the "mine ban treaty" have given Turkey until March 1, 2022, to clear its minefields. That was agreed in 2013 when they froze their progress. The original agreed time to have it all done was ... 2014. --Caustic Logic (talk) 12:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Other
Tass rebroadcasts Western reports on a topic of malahim, not commenting on it.

Russia: UNSC authorization required. --Resup (talk) 15:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

A rare Russian video report from Kobane (or nearby). Report is strongly critical of Turkey, blaming it for halting humanitarian help to Kurds in Kobane, not allowing refugees to Turkey and insufficient help to those already there; while helping ISIS, including ammunition (and as the report claims, even some tanks). Turkey actions are places in perspective as being anti-Sadat. An elderly Kurd refugee interviewed towards the end laments the civil was in Syria which destroyed their cities and left them with nothing. He mentioned that their complaints before the civil war were that they could not identify themselves as Kurds in their passport. (Report appears to try to convey some pro-Assad and critical of Turkey impression.) --Resup (talk) 14:03, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Article Idea
It's a bit late to work ideally, but ... CE, you've become an expert on this subject. You should write up an article on it. Even just as "CE," you've got some presence so I think Global Research would run it. One angle that made me almost want to write it myself was the headline about how ISIS was now conquering places "on NATO's doorstep." I guess what they meant was they were taking over next to a door other than the one most of their members probably entered Syria through ... But I'd have to brush up on a lot, and I'm already pressed for time (aren't we all?) Up to me, nothing. Up to you, maybe collaborative, your call. Ideally it's mention Turkey's insane claim that no one crosses in through them, compared to the Reyhanli bombing and that border crossing dispute where (JaN?) threatened to do it again and got the crossing re-opened, stuff like that. Maybe that's too ambitious, but the idea's got some potential and I should mention it. --Caustic Logic (talk) 23:15, 10 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'll think about that. There's certainly a lot to say about these denials, especially combined with the Ras Al-Ayn story two years ago. When everything happened directly through the border post and these gangs still called themselves FSA, long before anybody had heard of ISIS. Unfortunately I've seen that one of the main sources I used at the time, the German-Kurdish diekurden.de, has completely disappeared and the URL now goes to some advertising crap. --CE (talk) 10:18, 11 October 2014 (UTC)