Talk:Alleged Chemical Attack, August 21, 2013/Latakia connection?


 * ''Moved from Talk:Latakia Massacres

I received this tip via Twitter from Brian Souter:
 * @PetriKrohn – FYI a Libyan kidnapper named Abu Suhaib Alleebi, Emir of the Mujahadeen Brigade. Kidnapped (children) in Latakia. May be connected to the kids in Ghouta.
 * ''Here is the kidnapper in Lattakia. It is believed this is same guy at 4:47 mins.

The first video ("Unless aired by Al-Jazeera for Latakia" – original) follows an al Jazeera team embedded with al Nusra / al Qaeda in Latakia. It shows a large group of women and children hostages "protected" by a hooded Nusra terrorist. One woman is interviewed by the reporter. (I do not know if al-Jazeera ever aired any of this, the video seems to be an al-Qaeda production of the al-Jazeera visit.) The second video (Issuance of the Mujahideen Brigade in Latakia to Abdullah the Chechen) is a 11 minute feature on Abdullah the Chechen uploaded on July 6, 2013. One of the people interviewed seems to be the kidnapper terrorist at the Latakia scene.
 * Fascinating footage. Anyone recognizable I wonder? On the guy, it could be the same. From that bit of his face I'd think no, but his voice and energy seem pretty consistent. How does it matter, though? He's perhaps seen twice as a Jihadist in Latakia, and allegedly the kids wound up in, or attributed to, reef Dimashq (Ghouta)? If the kids things is separately illustrated, as a guy overseeing them prior to their gassing, I guess he's a suspect. --Caustic Logic (talk) 07:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Yesterday Arabi Souri suggested that "some pictures of the children killed by 'Sarin chemical gas' in Ghouta (#Damascus Countryside) are for children kidnapped from #Latakia countryside." claiming that "their families recognized them." I do not know what the source is, but seems to reflect what is said in this Arabic language post on Facebook. I can only understands one comment: Brian Souter this explains why as Voltaire net observes the chldren were without parents.
 * And this is what would matter. It surely makes enough sense to pursue. Were they taken to Ghouta? No, way too far. If this is true, it must be those in locations that can't be placed, but are in Idlib or Turkey or something, with the names of Ghouta towns brought up there and stapled on. --Caustic Logic (talk) 07:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

The reference is to this article on Voltaire Network:
 * Sarin Gas : a new propaganda campaign against Syria – 23 August 2013
 * On these videos, shocking at first, one quickly detects a setup: the wounded children appear haggard or drugged, do not have parents who accompany them. Boys are often naked, while the girls are all dressed. We see no hospital structure, not even a clandestine one, except screens and pockets of serum.

-- Petri Krohn (talk) 02:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

The story is picking up steam. Problem is, no new evidence is presented. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 12:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Syrian Children Kidnapped By Rebels Identified As Gas Victims By Obama Administration (Video) – Steve Foley, September 8, 2013
 * www.theminorityreportblog * com/2013/09/08/syrian-children-kidnapped-by-rebels-identified-as-gas-victims-by-obama-administration-video/

Mother Agnes
Mother Agnes Mariam el-Salib is saying the Ghouta CW massacre footage is a hoax. I am fast coming to the same conclusion. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 10:15, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Footage of chemical attack in Syria is fraud – RT, September 06, 2013

She might be right, but some points sound silly. She asks, among other things, "How come we don’t see any female bodies among all those supposedly dead children?" The significance, of course, is war booty, the fatwas saying any non-Sunni female over age 14 captured in Jihad is yours to do with as you please. And hasn't there been enough killing and not enough "loving?" So if these are the Alawites (or app. non-Muslim "infidel" Kurdish parties) this pattern matters. This has popped into my mind too looking at images where you see men and then children (the Kafr Batna morgue for one). The obvious answer is that the women are the ones the ones under the blankets, of which there are several. And it could be. But as already noted, the SCDV database also shows, of 515 total victims listed at the moment, only 116 are adult females, age cut-off unclear. That's to 299 men. But with exactly 100 children - evenly spread 51/49, it appears more an abundance of male captive-victims that stands out here. Some higher number of men is likely for a few reasons, but for supposedly home-invading gasses that killed all, these numbers are out of whack. Also consider teenagers are likely split-off from children at about 14 (depending who files the reports, perhaps). The bloated men's category took that boost and the women's... perhaps that's the missing segment? Who doesn't like them kind of young? --Caustic Logic (talk) 12:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Mother Agnes explains the lack of evidence for the Latakia identification: ''First of all, there are family members who say they have recognized their children. They pointed to specific videos from Kfar Batna and Jobar.'' -- Petri Krohn (talk) 23:26, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Children in Syria chemical attack video 'moved between locations' before 'staged' filming – RT, September 18, 2013

Killed hostages?
This video tryes to identify some of the victims, matching them to rebes prisoners shown on Shabiha videos. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 21:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC) The uploader is on Facebook here. I do not know where he lives. Maybe Australia. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 21:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Syria Undeniable PROOF SNC & Al Farok did Chemical Weapons Attack in Syria 8 21 2013 – NevaehWest, Sep 11, 2013

Here is a list of missing children: -- Petri Krohn (talk) 23:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The Ghouta chemical attack: Where are the missing children? – Oriental Review, Sep 20, 2013