Talk:Dale Gavlak

Mint Press Article

 * Moved from main talk page Talk:Alleged Chemical Attack, August 21, 2013

Breaking: AP journalist publishes story claiming al-Qaeda and Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan were responsible for carrying out the Ghouta gas attack! (See Tubes in tunnels? below)
 * EXCLUSIVE: Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack – By Dale Gavlak and Yahya Ababneh | MintPress News, August 29, 2013
 * Rebels and local residents in Ghouta accuse Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan of providing chemical weapons to an al-Qaida linked rebel group.


 * I don't know about the author or Mint Press, but I don't trust this report. Some odd writing, some really odd quotes. Maybe I need to re-read it, but first pass felt weird. They can point right at Bandar, and cite the spooky tunnels, which both make enough sense, but then they consistently claim there was an accident, in (9 towns?) at once, accidentally killing hundreds, or 1,000+, because of improper training? Right after the CW inspectors came? Was there a coordinated mass-handling of those mysterious canisters that night by the duped rebels, and then timers were set off? How many people would blame themselves and accident for that? It's a bizarre story and I suspect disinfo/propaganda, one way or another. I'm pretty sure whoever did whatever, they did it on purpose. --Caustic Logic (talk) 10:42, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I shouldn't be quite so harsh. If one strips away the 8-9 towns and considers, as described, just one accident - and perhaps not coincidence but related to a plan to have them unwittingly release the gas, ... Maybe there was an accident involved, and those who survived it felt it was THE explanation. But instead, it would coincide with whatever other actions, by whoever, that led to however many deaths that this alone can hardly explain. --Caustic Logic (talk) 12:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * There could have been more "accidents" and isn't it possible that these things had some radio (edit: or better time - one year red line) triggered release mechanism? Would be a cunning plan worthy of Bandar Bush - you distribute the stuff to your vanilla rebels who store it somewhere near their homes, so you can be sure there will be rebel areas affected when you release it. At least possible. Anyway, I share your general skepticism about the article to a degree, although the author seems to be kind of legit and could have the proper contacts. --CE (talk) 12:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * When I first read the article, it sounded so un-fucking-believable for mainstream media that I thought the author was Sorcha Faal of . The fact is however, that Dale Gavlak is a respected journalist for AP. Quoting InfoWars.com
 * Dale Gavlak’s credibility is very impressive. He has been a Middle East correspondent for the Associated Press for two decades and has also worked for National Public Radio (NPR).
 * It is likely Dale Gavlak will never again write anything for any mainstream media. The story however is as credible as anything the the mainstream press has ever printed. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 14:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Attempted debunk; focuses on the credibility of the authors, cites Brown Moses. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 21:45, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * DEBUNKED: Syrian rebels admit to AP reporter they mishandled the chemical weapons given by Saudi Arabia – Antonin Gregoire, September 3, 2013


 * That was a complete waste of time. Pseudo-skeptical douchebag shadowboxing. --CE (talk) 22:27, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Dale Gavlak disowns article
This was expected. What surprises me is that this came out in the Brown Moses blog! Also surprising is that it took Dale Gavlak a almost a month to come out and say this.
 * Statement By Dale Gavlak On The Mint Press Article "Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack" – Brown Moses, 20 September 2013
 * ''Mint Press News incorrectly used my byline for an article it published on August 29, 2013 alleging chemical weapons usage by Syrian rebels. Despite my repeated requests, made directly and through legal counsel, they have not been willing to issue a retraction stating that I was not the author. Yahya Ababneh is the sole reporter and author of the Mint Press News piece.  To date, Mint Press News has refused to act professionally or honestly in regards to disclosing the actual authorship and sources for this story.
 * ''I did not travel to Syria, have any discussions with Syrian rebels, or do any other reporting on which the article is based. The article is not based on my personal observations and should not be given credence based on my journalistic reputation. Also, it is false and misleading to attribute comments made in the story as if they were my own statements.

I knew she never traveled to Syria. It was my understanding she was the author of the part blaming Prince Bandar Bush. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 18:27, 20 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Minitrue at work. --CE (talk) 18:48, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

I saw last night that we didn't mentioned here Dale (usually a He?) didn't really write it, more vouched for (?) Yahya's reporting. Now he disowns his part. I'm still skeptical of Yahya's reporting, although Petri's last explanation made it a little more plausible to me. But now we have an AP reporter of credibility who wants nothing to do with it. If true, sabotaged in several ways, hard to rescue in a war zone like this, best left behind 'til proper burial can be arranged. --Caustic Logic (talk) 23:04, 20 September 2013 (UTC)


 * This episode hardly changes my trust or distrust in the article. It is one possible piece of the puzzle. We have to find the pieces that fit together. If details in the article match those we can deduce form other evidence, then most likely the writers did not just make the stuff up. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 00:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Antiwar.com

 * Retraction and Apology to Our Readers for Mint Press Article on Syria Gas Attack – Eric Garris, September 20, 2013
 * ''The staff of Antiwar.com sincerely and deeply apologizes for being a part of spreading this article. We also apologize to Dale Gavlak.

Dale Gavlak via Brown Moses

 * More From Dale Gavlak On The Mint Press Article – 21 September 2013

Spin and speculation

 * Sharmine Narwani on her FB page:
 * ''Infowarriors are trying to discredit the Mint Press article that has rebels in Ghouta blaming Saudis for bringing chemical weapons into the area. The AP correspondent Dale Gavlak who co-wrote the article is trying to distance herself from it (I hear, under pressure) and has issued a denial on this blog I link to.
 * ''But look at what Dale wrote to me on August 30, the day after the article was published: "Basically I helped Yahya Ababneh, who traveled to Gouta, to write what he saw and heard. He mainly met with rebels, of course, the father of one of the rebels killed and doctors treating victims in the area. He has traveled to Syria numerous times. As you know Mint Press News is more of an advocacy journalism site and it seems to be the most likely to publish such a piece." - This last part in response to my question to her asking why she didn't publish the article on AP
 * (Reposted here, here and here)


 * dale gavlak is obviously under enormous pressure to dissociate herself from the story, but that does not mean it’s false – Niqnaq, September 21, 2013


 * Rowan Berkeley on Moon of Alabama on Sep 21, 2013
 * ''The actual truth of the matter is obvious: (1) Yahya Ababneh did the field-work and the interviews, for MPN; (2) Ababneh sent his notes to Gavlak for editing into a story, since both of them work for MPN; (3) the two of them naturally shared the byline for the final product on MPN; (4) Gavlak has now been informed by multiple employers that if she doesn’t retract, she’ll never work for them again, which I said at the time would be her penalty for writing it.

Mint Press statement

 * Official Statement On Dale Gavlak’s Involvement In Syria Exclusive – September 21, 2013