Talk:Forced landing of Ryanair flight in Minsk

Was this a Western false-flag operation?
The reporting in Western media is a total fabrication. Even English language Russian media like RT and Sputnik have fallen for the trap. The Ryanair plane was not hijacked or intercepted by a MiG fighter. All that actually happened was that the air traffic control in Minsk received an anonymous email containing a bomb threat. (It is unknown whether the ATCs in Athens or Vilnius had received similar mail from the Protonmail address.)


 * Content of Ryanair aircraft bomb message revealed - belta.by, May 24, 2021
 * ''“We, soldiers of Hamas, demand that Israel cease fire in the Gaza Strip. We demand that the European Union stop supporting Israel in this war. We know that participants of the Delfi Economic Forum are returning home aboard flight FR4978. A bomb has been planted on the aircraft. If our demands are not met, the bomb will explode over Vilnius on 23 May.”
 * ''Information about the threat was passed on to the Ryanair crew right after the aircraft entered Belarus' airspace and communication was established between a Belarusian air traffic controller and the aircraft. “At that time the crew could use the opportunity and return to Lvov, Kiev, could land in Warsaw, continue the flight to Vilnius and so on. At 12:34 the air traffic controller suggested the Minsk National Airport where all the necessary equipment for landing aircraft in complicated meteorological conditions is available as well as a runway as long as 3,600 meters. The crew asked to clarify sources of the tip about the bomb several times. The crew was told the initial message had been sent to the Minsk National Airport. Prior to that the flight operations director of the Minsk area center had tried to call Ryanair's representative office in Lithuania several times but he failed to reach any representative of the air carrier,” Artyom Sikorsky said.

After the email was received everything happened exactly according to international norms and standards. It was the decision of the Ryanair captain alone to turn back and land in Minsk.


 * Who sent the email?

As I said in my follow-up comment on Moon of Alabama, I suspect this was a Western false-flag operation. All I am actually seeing in this is a gigantic narrative management operation by Americans and their proxies. They have dictated the narrative even before Belarus knew what happened.


 * I am starting to think the "forced landing" was a hoax and the whole incident just another Western provocation. Belarusians claim that the decision to diver to Minsk was made by the Ryan Air captain, after he somehow received information about a bomb threat. Sending a fighter jet to escort a hijacked plane or one with a bomb onboard is standard operating procedure after 9/11.
 * It is Roman Protasevich, who claims he is facing a death penalty in Belarus. Unless he was supposed to be the hit man in the plot to assassinate Lukashenko, the claim is unlikely to be true. Maybe he was ready to spend a few years in prison "for the cause", just like Navalny was.

The three reasons that make me believe the hoax email was sent by Western intelligence services and not by Belarus.


 * 1) Qui bono?
 * 2) Modus operandi
 * 3) Massive narrative management operation

It is premature to congratulate Lukashenko for a well-executed revenge. The costs are likely to far outstrip any benefits that Roman Protasevich might bring. Actually he may soon be flying to Vilnius or Warsaw.

Even Bellingcat noted that the plan follows exactly the script set up by Ukrainian SBU in 2020. But it goes far beyond that. Edward Snowden said the primary reason that made him defect was his repulsion at how the CIA abused its foreign assets. First they used them but at any moment they could be thrown under the bus. There is a long but unproven trail of this happening from Politkovskaya to Litvinenko to Skripal to Navalny. Protasevich's Nazi past makes him a prime candidate for dumping.

Belarus may not even have known that Roman Protasevich was onboard unless his pall Franak Viačorka had not tweeted that "Belarus has seized a plane" and Roman is "facing the death penalty." Vital for narrative management, but may have cost Protasevich his freedom.

-- Petri Krohn (talk) 18:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Fall-out
False flag or not, unsure, obviously info provided by Belarus points to former.

Mixed feelings overall. Opposition has some legit points, like insufficient freedoms, lower economic prosperity of post/neo -Soviet Belarus economy vs the West. On emotional level, the West may be more attractive to a young person then Belarus. But also this is heavily fed and exploited by Western establishment to undermine Lukashenko and to use Belarus as another weapon against Russia, like Ukraine was, and as a strategic platzdarm of Cold War 2 or WW3. Those youngsters do not appreciate that if this old-fashion post -Soviet economy will come down, they will be left with their naked asses in the street, not suddenly become living American or European dream. There are moneys to ruin their present system but no money or intent to make them prosper--as Zinoviev tried but failed to communicate to Yeltsin back in the 1990's.

With this, what is happening now is that Protasevich and his girlfriend gadgets and themselves are being examined by Belarus services to extract information on people who collaborated with them (or sponsored them). The result will be that many people will have problems with the law, not just this pair. Some of those may be bad people, and some may be genuine opposition and not necessarily bad or evil. Already some guy is named who worked in a bank security service and had access to some non-public police databases which he was willing to leak for info on law enforcement, perhaps for cashback. Probably there are many more people not doing something that bad but who will be netted anyway; this is not exactly being handled by a rose pony ballet company. --Resup (talk) 20:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

EU Comparisons

 * ''In 1988, Bulgaria’s  population peaked at 8.9 million. Now it stands at 6.9 million. That means that, in little over three decades, the country’s population has fallen by an extraordinary 22.5 per cent. ....In 1988, Bulgaria’s population peaked at 8.9 million. Now it stands at 6.9 million. That means that, in little over three decades, the country’s population has fallen by an extraordinary 22.5 per cent.

borgenproject.org the-deeply-rooted-causes-of-poverty-in-estonia (blocked by filter)
 * Estonia population declined 15% from 1990 to 2020.
 * While it was a part of the USSR, Estonia had an economy that was for the most part equally beneficial to everyone, and had the status of the most prosperous member of the Soviet Union....One in five people live under the poverty line in Estonia. Statistics Estonia reported in 2014 that 21.6 percent of people were considered impoverished and 6.3 percent lived in deep poverty. 8 percent of the poor are employed--

Industrial production decline is likely even greater, economy likely services, agriculture, tourism, as Soviet industrial output would be incompatible with EU.

Way of life, values --likely comprehensively altered. --Resup (talk) 22:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)