File talk:Russia planted conspiracy.jpg

I do not follow the logic in Telegraph article. I do not see how falsifying 'the handler' work for Orbis would do much good in blaming the British for Skripal (how does this even work out?) Such profile (assumed accurate) would work towards blaming the Russians for Skripal instead, in an obvious way. If profile is fake, anybody could do it for whatever reason. If it cannot be solidly established that GRU faked it (as follows form the article) but it is definitely fake, the best hope for blaming Russia falls apart. Just saying 'well maybe GRU faked it' does not lead anything anywhere, WTF to write such an article? --Resup (talk) 16:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Noted, earlier article, of the same author, on the same topic, came to attention of Russian patriotic opposition, and was presented as evidence that the West is set on Yugoslavia/Iraq/Libya path with respect to relations with Russia --Resup (talk) 16:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ХОРОШИЙ САГИБ У САМИ И УМНЫЙ, ТОЛЬКО БОЛЬНО ДЕРЕТСЯ СТЭКОМ... (Good Sahib, mus-taches, and clever, but beats with a stake, badly), by putnik1, Jan. 7, 2019)