Talk:Totalitarian Media Regime

WO2020060606

 * Cryptocurrency system using body activity data, published by patents.google.com/; patentscope.wipo.int, etc.
 * ...[0005] Some exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure may use human body activity associated with a task provided to a user as a solution to“mining” challenges in cryptocurrency systems. For example, a brain wave or body heat emitted from the user when the user performs the task provided by an information or service provider, such as viewing advertisement or using certain internet services, can be used in the mining process. Instead of massive computation work required by some conventional cryptocurrency systems, data generated based on the body activity of the user can be a proof-of-work, and therefore, a user can solve the computationally difficult problem unconsciously. Accordingly, certain exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure may reduce computational energy for the mining process as well as make the mining process faster.

I removed this from the main page as I do not see how it is related to the topic. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 15:30, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

This is MSFT patent proposing a method to generate payment potentially for something like watching correct news, possibly having correct thoughts, like positively reacting to correct news... Or at least this is how that was being interpreted.... Likewise,  this brain-chip interface by Elon Musk, etc. Claims are highly controversial, but this seem to give something solid which is really done, not a threat just imagined. It talks about advertisement, but that may go hand-in-hand with managed news. (With some stretch, maybe; at least presently, highest traffic for adds will be with mainstream sources). --Resup (talk) 16:53, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Michigan, 2020
This was retweeted by Trump, and in its present form missing graphics explaining what is this about. This graphics is presently here and in Russians-attempted-interfeering with-elections version here. I do not know where this claim originated. It could be fake and could be inserted from abroad, but in any case it deserves explanation. If it is fake/not accurate, why not to claim so, as opposed to removing it without any explanation? If it is accurate, should it not stay and be explained? It was already seen by millions world wide and it serves no good to just censor it, as opposed to explaining the actual state of affairs --Resup (talk) 18:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Seems to be explained by the original poster:
 * ''This tweet was taken and share honestly. I have now learned the MI update referenced was a typo in one county. I have deleted the original tweet.
 * To be clear: that typo in one county increased Biden's vote by 138339 votes without changing counts of any other listed candidate
 * OK, typo is divisible by 9, and 153710 - 15371 explanation is in the plausible ballpark. But the correct one is what, 15371 ? And it was corrected bringing it down? And B still overtook T later on? (Whale-Oil-Bear-Hugged...)

--Resup (talk) 18:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Hmm, duckdiver suspended ? But he is the source who clarified things, above? Strange. Also some plots, who knows from where, showing upsteps in Michigan and Wisconsin, at about the same time, and that damn duck floating in there ? --Resup (talk) 02:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)