Talk:Odessa Trade Union massacre/101 call

Transcript
Recording apparently starts at or before 19:40 pm, since recording timestamp 27:00 is 20:07 pm local time. May be starting at earlier local time, since apparently recording is voice-activated (further local time reports are behind later time stamps)


 * (0:0) a woman on Kulikovo, saying that fire approaches the building and urging the operator (o) to :send (fire truck) immediately. Operator tells the caller the fire is on open air and there is no danger. :Caller insists. Operator than insists for the caller to say whether or not she is herself in the open space. :Once confirmed, operator hangs up on her immediately. Some giggles or noises follow. Then audio, :which appears to be the same woman goes
 * (0:45) (o=operator) "comrade Colonel (c), now 2 calls received already, that the tents are on fire . :They burn fast, they are on open air, and we see it on TV. So I explain people that this is an open area, :and there is no danger".
 * (c=colonel): hm-mm, yeah... and who calls? (in Russian, strong Ukrainian or southern accent)
 * (o) a woman called two times already
 * (c) so, civilians are calling?
 * (o) yes, I explain there is no danger
 * (c) yeah, not a question (i.e. approves “no danger” answer)
 * next caller: we see lots of smoke
 * (o) yes, we know
 * so what's going on, are they burning tires?
 * (o) yes


 * (3:08) Chief car arrived to our post, they left Savchenko, and  departed
 * (3:21) (man) who deals with the photos?
 * (o) photos are taken
 * (man) forward to me than


 * (4:48) Tania, you called us and asked, are you watching? Or, never mind, it was “7” calling
 * (5:37)(man, who is hesitant to describe who he is and eventually presents himself as a volunteer, of paramilitary sort) Athens hall on fire, we have some smoke. (o) asks many questions, apparently just some smoke, not much happening there
 * (7:00)policeman on duty for the city of Odessa (city wide watch) calls and tells to dispatch dire track :(o) asks somebody for advice. Advice is to say (apparently pretend) that they are sending the fire trucks.
 * (o) asks why they are needed, it’s just the tents. In the end, no indication that anything is sent


 * (7:47)(o) Alina, when did you call us about news you saw on TV? About 5 pm
 * (o) No it was earlier. –OK, I will ask Azhinskii (?), we were together, and call back ( answer apparently revised to 3 pm)


 * (8:15) A woman calls, says the building is on fire, and molotovs/IUD going off can be heard. (o) The building itself? (confirms she understood)
 * (9:16)A man calls and tells (o) to prepare, so when the command is given, they are ready to go
 * (10:27)somebody they know calls, and tells, OK, send the trucks already, fire is now on the building footsteps (o) is in favor of thinking it is just the tents on fire; in the end says “I understand”
 * (10:53) A woman calls to report fire. ( o) says it’s just some tires burning, and there is no danger
 * (11:20) policeman on duty for the city of Odessa calls, and tells an order to deploy is given. (o) is skeptical why this is needed, asks some questions. Ends with (o) saying “I understand”.
 * Some 9 -10 calls come in, saying that building is on fire, all floors, people are trapped, asking to send trucks, demanding to know why there are no trucks. (o) tells she “understand”, or hangs up sometime
 * (14:19) (man, barely audible)
 * (another man, well audible)help is needed, to receive photos, and to send them with a courier dispatch, OK?
 * OK.
 * (14:42)somebody from “HQ for civilian security” (  in charge of block posts  ) calls to report fire at Kulikovo building. (o) “understands”.
 * about 11 incoming calls, reported fire, fire trucks are needed, high ladder is needed
 * (17:50) A man on duty calls. Why don’t we go to Kulikovo already? Top brass now starts to yell at me
 * (o) OK, we will go
 * man: oh, it has not been done yet?
 * (o) it has been
 * (18:15) dispatching 1 (one) fire truck to Kulikovo, instructed to enter from Kanatnaia Street, next to military commendatura   (HQ) “ tents on fire, and some fire on footsteps.” Local time = 19.56.


 * 17 or so more incoming calls, building on fire, people are trapped, not a single fire truck
 * Caller urges to send ALL trucks not just one
 * caller urges to make sure there is safety net, as people jump from the building
 * A cell phone number of a woman trapped inside, who called back home, is given to the operator
 * (24:02) A caller yells at (o) that there are children (incorrectly) and women (correctly) in the building. (o) questions how they got there. Verbal exchange ends with (o) hanging up.
 * (25:00) caller asks whether trucks have safety nets as people jump. (o) does not know.
 * (25:40) difficulty to reach the building is reported, Gubaii V.V., head of firefighting department, is in charge of that team


 * (26:06) Chief of MoI department asks, where are your fire trucks??There is nothing for 20 minutes, where they are coming from???There is not a single one here! (o) They will arrive soon.
 * Where are they, where are they will be coming from?
 * When our bosses gave orders, we dispatched them immediately. Fire trucks were at the stadium, one was captured, so you need to understand. I understand you, and we dispatched them already now


 * (27:06) fire water-tanker type truck is dispatched
 * (27:20) truck with ladder is dispatched . Local time 20.07 pm.
 * about 6 more calls that no trucks have arrived
 * (29:15-32:43) (20.17-20.25 pm local) water tanker, pump, another fire truck are dispatched. Names of crew chiefs are given
 * 29:35 (o) asks "Lilia" what trucks she has still left, answer is ГДЗС ("gases and smoke protection vehicle"), and рукавный truck (providing mobile pipework to feed water). Those two trucks are dispatched at (29:47) =20.17 pm local.
 * (32:59) incoming call, people trapped in burning building, 5 floor, suffering from smoke
 * cell phone number of a trapped woman is provided to (o)


 * (34:45) “18 coroner reports “ called for
 * HQ car has left? No, it’s still here.

.--Resup (talk) 02:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Link for video with the calls

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN8VR4PpjZ0 KatKan (talk) 01:16, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Timeline
Resup, you have 27:00 equating to 8:07, but that's not explained that I saw. It would be good to know when these calls came in, if the timeline is continuous or compressed, etc. Looking at the link you provided for Bodelan, it says: 20:07 the chief of the regional police Department phoned 101 and shouted, "Where fire trucks?". Is that around 27:00? We have some prior calls with time-stamps, like the 7:45 call about a fire on floor 2 "co" the entrance. If that's recognizable in this stream, a time-stamp would help. If it's continuous and we can set 2-3 synch points, the whole video could have a known real-time offset so every call can be timed. --Caustic Logic (talk) 01:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

This is 26:06 time stamp, I did not type it before, it's there now. Whenever I give local time in the transcript, it is because they tell the local time (for the record). Recording appears to be voice-activated, so there may be longer physical time interval compared to recording time interval (but not by too much) --Resup (talk) 02:05, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * That's one way to know, if they say what time it is (the people there know already, but it helps us). A call one minute earlier is also 8:07, all close enough for that part. It is however more than likely compressed. No gaps, timeline unsure. Some confusing references also to the earlier fire. --Caustic Logic (talk) 04:42, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Unclear what's the story with Athens center smoke; could be something happened there later, or a fake report was made. It does not appear to be about clashes, some other smoke --Resup (talk) 04:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * There are details in Rada report, including some timeline --Resup (talk) 04:49, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Dispatcher Identified?
I cannot verify this ID, and not sure how it was made, but ... --Caustic Logic (talk) 04:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Bloggers have found the culprit Odessa tragedy may 2 Riafan.ru (from Russian)
 * In tragedy 2 may blame the service Manager 101
 * The Internet literally exploded [sic] the appearance of the first audio and then the video of how terrible day may 2 rescue service in Odessa for nearly 40 minutes had ignored pleas for help from those who burned alive in the House of trade unions. How do I find the bloggers, the Manager in the day fateful day was the captain of the civil protection service Svetlana Koeva ( Светлана Коева ).
 * On audio is heard well that Koeva in response to dozens of panicked calls about the fire, assured that nothing they believe their own eyes that burn in the open, nothing terrible...
 * ...Terrible record originally published online publication "Думская.net". (Dumskaya.net)
 * As noted by the authors, the first call about the fire came on room 101 at 19.35, when the radicals set fire to a tent camp on the Kulikovo field. However Koeva refused to send fire brigades, citing the fact that "burning in the open, nothing threatens".
 * Ten minutes later at 19:45 showered panic calls that is already burning the House of trade unions, but the Manager still refused to take action.
 * Svetlana Coeval actually did not take adequate measures to rescue dozens of people.
 * ...And here is what he writes about Svetlana Koeva for the year before the tragedy edition "Evening Odessa":
 * "At first, Svetlana, as she says, it was scary to take responsibility: taking a message, to send the call to the fire and rescue Department. "Over time you get used to this tension: my job is to help people....
 * She appears to be a small fish under orders .... --Resup (talk) 05:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Maybe her ideology lent her to this inhuman task, or even to over-doing it, but I don't think that's knowable. Likely she was, as you say, just acting on orders and not just being rude, though that's also unknowable. If so, they were orders she should have protested or not followed, and I'd say she's due for an explanation, like who gave these orders. Calling her "the culprit" is obviously silly, but she might be a culprit who could lead to bigger ones. (As if anyone in power will be pushing for such info when they already know and approved it all...) --Caustic Logic (talk) 07:21, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If this was indeed Svetlana, she received an award (like a medal) for bravery for her May 2 firefighting... No ideology appears involved on her part, on top of "study in college, get a job" ideology. Same ideology as everybody else who was acting on improbable guidance and got paid and promoted for doing that well.  --Resup (talk) 11:41, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Following orders: thinking about this, I imagine the orders can in the form of odd assurances, and I start by wondering how she can be so sure all is fine when the people calling are there and she isn't. A normal person would reason the caller knows better and not shout them down or hang up on them like some liar. Maybe someone outside the usual command loop but with authority and that she trusted (some cop, SBU, etc.), who was in on the plot, set her mentally. Say he gave her the news early in the day of the brutal Russian agents killing innocent Euro-kids downtown, and lit the cinder of the need to clear their camp finally. She had his assurances he'd be there keeping it controlled - no one would be harmed, no one hiding in a building burned out, only tents or tires in open areas would ever be torched. Then maybe he told her there would be paid Russian agents calling all day insisting on a dangerous fire. "They'll be trying to get their precious camp saved, so ignore their lies. No emergency, and tomorrow no more Russian terrorists problem." The right political mindset (basic compliant patriot minimum) would help, but they wouldn't want to pick some known Right Sector sympathizer. (the photo to me shows a compatible type of dead-inside) The delay in response could be however long it took for the assurances to wear thin in the face of the calls, the number and variety ...  I don't yet know how well that lines up with the content ... could she keep Bodelan out of the loop by not sending alerts up to him? Not if he was at the site himself, as suggested (I'm not convinced)  ... can you keep someone from talking about that just by cozying up with awards and veiled threats? ... sure, I suppose.  --Caustic Logic (talk) 13:22, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * They may have told her that those tents are a fire safety violation and so supposed to burn down controllably for the sake of fire safety, and somebody is taking care of everything, she just have to do what the manager, whoever that was,  say  (or something similar, with cozying up at a later point)
 * Large proportion of all people know, or suspect, or should have, that part of what they do is not right, or not ideal at least; if any of them will get an idea to resist, it will be entirely different world, like perhaps what they dream about in Novorossia (...that does not seem to go too well either...)

--Resup (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Investigations
Rada investigation record essentially similar times of dispatches and gives details of number of units deployed. It records that decision not to send fire trucks was taken by Vladimir Bodelan, who explained it by perceived danger to fire rescue crews and the fact that one truck was seized. Bodelan claims he was located at Kulikovo.

However Rada account is much  washed out compared to the actual 101 transcripts and create an impression of mostly regular- orderly developments. There is a serious doubt on that, based on call transcripts. Bodelan role is hidden in transcripts (he says he made an order orally; it is not recorded). However it is clear that police on duty called in the fire trucks, and that the name of officer and circumstances were carefully questioned, but no trucks were sent. If there was perceived danger to crews, it would be the police job to handle, not fire rescue to get scared of in silence from the police. Also transcripts suggest some sort of careful bookkeeping performed (what's the deal with those photos?), with several 'managers' involved (both distant and nearby male voices, popping in after some distinct from regular phone call beeps).

Bodelan was disciplined, but no criminal charges. Some further details, in Russian, are here --Resup (talk) 16:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC)