File:Urm al-Kubra Warehouse Attack Angles.png

Photo source: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/photos-syrian-aid-convoy-hit-by-air-strikes-that-killed-least-12-1582264

Damaged Red Cross and Red Crescent medical supplies are seen in a warehouse with a hole in the roofOmar haj Kadour/AFP

Discussion
Minor point on graphics, but true vertical fall would be further back towards back pillar, -that way be assumed to be vertical. While through-the hole-into-crater path, obviously needs to go through the hole, on top if this is a 3D illustration. (Understood that it's tricky to draw those things with graphics ...Gives an idea as it is, too )--Resup (talk) 15:05, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * You can't see just where the line is, but maybe the circle is a bit too close to the camera. Otherwise it's about right. --Caustic Logic (talk) 23:33, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

I have noticed that the flight path and the burn marks on the wall are in almost exactly a 90 degree angle. This is similar to the shrapnel pattern from a GRAD rocket. I do not know if mortar shells would explode as directionally. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 20:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Most Grads are fragmentation sort, that will leave quite large shrapnel marks somewhere on walls, I'd think but I can't see any --Resup (talk) 23:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Anything with a radial or tube-shaped charge should do that, I think - definitely a rocket, possibly some mortar shells (don't know) --Caustic Logic (talk) 23:33, 28 September 2016 (UTC)