Talk:Alleged Chemical Attack, April 13, 2013

Location
Sheikh Maqsoud is a large district, per the boundaries on Wikimapia and density of buildings within, it must be one of the more populous districts. It has a majority Jurdish population, and didn'tfall to the rebels until shortly before this incident. It's been the site of looting, kidnapping, torture and executions by rebel brigades even the SOHR reported, the public beheading of a prominent pro-government Imam, and more. More detail/links etc. later. --Caustic Logic (talk) 10:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Foaming at the Mouth?
Still no discussion? Well, here's a good starter. I heard this Israeli talk of foaming at the mouth (see NYT article for example), and was a bit confused until I learned the missing link, making this alleged sarin attack this same one in Sheikh Maqsoud (although Khan al-Assal still has no better guess than "super-strength tear gas"). --Caustic Logic (talk) 10:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Daily Mail April 24:
 * Experts believe that chemical weapons may have been dropped on Kurdish residents of Aleppo's Sheikh Massoud [sic] region during an attack which saw two babies and a woman killed earlier this month. ... It is thought that the April 13 assault may have been in revenge for residents' decision to defect to support the rebels.

(Wonder if all the foreign fighters and weapons influenced their decision to hand the place over to rebels?) --Caustic Logic (talk) 10:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC) 15 people were injured, they report, and rebel sources provided names for the dead, still only three. Four-month-old Yehia, 18-month-old Abu Bakr Younis and adult Ghadeer Neddaf. There's a video you can see there (see below for analysis) "posted on the Facebook page of British-trained doctor Niazi Habash, who treated some of the Aleppo victims."
 * He said that they displayed symptoms of chemical exposure including foaming at the mouth, constricted pupils and difficulty breathing. They were treated using chemical weapons antidote Atropine, Dr Habash claims.
 * Experts claim that their injuries appear to be similar to those suffered by victims of an attack on Khan al-Assad [sic], near Aleppo.
 * ''The most likely chemical to have been used is sarin according to former British Army specialist and director Hamish de Bretton-Gordon.
 * He told the Telegraph: From what we've seen and the descriptions of the containers being dropped from the air, it certainly seems that the regime is using sarin in an unprepared state in these attacks. But, as in the Tokyo subway bombings, sarin does not need to be weaponised and placed in missiles to kill. 'It is still lethal when people are exposed to it.'

Unprepared sarin, because it was in canisters, and the people in the video look so much like sarin victims? Hmmm.... --Caustic Logic (talk) 10:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The Guardian, April 26:
 * Some of the videos in circulation online show alleged victims foaming at the mouth, but that is not listed as a sarin symptom on the website of the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.

(I saw drooling and runny nose cited for low-level exposure clues, so high-level, who knows...) --Caustic Logic (talk) 11:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Richard Guthrie, a British chemical weapons expert and former head of the Chemical and Biological Warfare Project of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, said: "That [foaming at the mouth] would not be indicative of use of nerve agents but is more likely to be a sign of a choking agent such as phosgene being used, if anything were used. Phosgene is a widely used industrial chemical as well as being a first world war-era chemical weapon."

(or choking agent like swallowed milk combined with a funny joke?) --Caustic Logic (talk) 10:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Jean-Pascal Zanders, an expert at the EU Institute for Strategic Studies, said: "It's not possible that what is being shown to the public is a chemical weapons attack. The video from Aleppo showing foaming at the mouth does not look like a nerve agent. I'm wholly unconvinced."’

Samples?

 * Sharmine Narwani, Al-Akhbar
 * The Times article then gets even stranger. To quote:
 * “In the chaos of Syria’s civil war, no hospital in the rebel-held areas has the facilities to test which gas was used. Yet medical sources in northern Syria have told The Times that in the immediate aftermath of the attack a team from “an American medical agency” arrived at the hospital in Afrin. They took hair samples from the casualties for testing at ‘an American laboratory.’
 * It is likely that these samples formed part of the evidence cited by the US Defence Secretary yesterday.”
 * Really? A CW attack takes place in the middle of the night in Aleppo, and in its “immediate aftermath” an “American medical agency” arrives to collect samples for testing?
 * It is likely that all the speculation in the past few days revolves around an incident that is looking more and more like the “false flag” operations anti-rebel Syrians have been warning about this past year. Given where the “evidence” is coming from, and the alleged presence of a western or American “medical agency” present on the ground, it is quite remarkable that Washington went full-court press on this.
 * It is likely that all the speculation in the past few days revolves around an incident that is looking more and more like the “false flag” operations anti-rebel Syrians have been warning about this past year. Given where the “evidence” is coming from, and the alleged presence of a western or American “medical agency” present on the ground, it is quite remarkable that Washington went full-court press on this.

This seems to be about the same incident as well. Except Afrin/Ifreen is way the heck north of rebel-held Sheiqh Maqsoud, half way to Turkey. Did that happen? Did the samples show sarin, phosgene, chlorine, or none of the above? --Caustic Logic (talk) 11:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Video Analysis
Video, 0:31, included with the Daily Mail article: "The video was posted on the Facebook page of British-trained doctor Niazi Habash, who treated some of the Aleppo victims." Also at these Youtube postings that popped up first: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtfXchDny0k http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tf6P3e6XD48

Initial assessment: At least four people are shown affected in a hospital setting, two women and two men. I hear sarin kills quickly when it does, so these are not apparently any of those who died, unless something else intervened. One woman seems real from her body language, in distress and very sad (0:08-0:12). The other might be real too, but it's more complicated - she's the same woman shown in SOHR photos (image 3), apparently alive here, no mucous bubbles, different room. But she looked dead in the SOHR image (So did the kids), so was it later? Nothing else says fake - alive, getting air, (then?) dead and covered with bubbles and snot. Also, she has what look like burns or nasty rash on her face (right cheek mainly), perhaps from that cloud of partly hydrochloric acid that chlorine's supposed to make when mixed with (water? - yes - mixed with saline, salty water). The burns are there when she's still alive, that's part of how I identified her. --Caustic Logic (talk) 11:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

The guy in image 4 I thought had a plugged nose is one of the two possible rebel fighters seen "foaming" here. Only the men do that, unlike the woman or the child, and no men died. That was when the white stuff first started coming out. Here (0:04-0:06), it's run down his face, looking like milk. The other allegedly affected man has the white stuff, a little foamier, on his chin, not lip. He acts like he has a headache or something, unconvincing. Both of them. --Caustic Logic (talk) 11:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)--Caustic Logic (talk) 10:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)